Archive for February, 2008

Snow by the hundreds

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

Steamboat Springs – Routt County’s snowfall late Monday and early Tuesday has the Steamboat Ski Area teetering at the brink of a 400-inch season and made for record-breaking measurements.

For the first time on record, the Steamboat Ski Area has seen three straight months – December, January and February – with at least 100 inches of snow. Ski Corp. spokeswoman Heidi Thomsen said the resort’s current records go back to the winter of 1979-80. The resort’s current total snowfall is 399 inches at mid-mountain.

“This is a really big winter,” Thomsen said. “I actually don’t remember skiing through this much snow, ever.”

Riding up the Morningside lift Tuesday afternoon, Jane Watson of Sacramento, Calif., wasn’t surprised to hear the numbers associated with Steam­boat’s memorable season.

“It shows,” Watson said. “You’re still finding little spots of fresh powder in there. I don’t think anybody’s having a bad day.”

With 40 days left before the resort’s April 6 closing, this season already is Steamboat’s sixth-snowiest. The resort needs just less than 50 inches of snow for the snowiest winter on record at Mount Werner. Thomsen said the chances are good.

“That’s a lot of days left,” she said. “In the past few years, we’ve gotten a fair amount of snow in March. Not 100 inches, but 50 to 60 inches.”

Steamboat’s season of big snow wasn’t expected and didn’t start early. Citing warm and dry conditions, Steamboat Ski and Resort Corp. delayed its Nov. 21 opening nine days to allow more time for snowmaking. And for months, federal climate experts have predicted a milder and drier winter due to a moderate La Niña effect in the Pacific. Those predictions finally took hold in recent weeks, as Steamboat saw little snow, many sunny days and several daily high temperatures above freezing. Similar conditions returned Tuesday afternoon and are expected to continue until this weekend, when another snowstorm is expected to hit the area.

“It looks like a decent storm this weekend,” said Mike Chamberlain, a forecaster with the National Weather Service in Grand Junction. “And it looks like it’s going to favor the northern mountains.”

But looking ahead, local skiers and snowboarders can expect more conditions similar to the past two weeks. Chamberlain said the forecast for the rest of the season shows a 40 to 50 percent chance of above-normal temperatures and a 33 percent chance of below-normal precipitation.

While waiting for a friend on the Flying Z Gulch run Tuesday afternoon, Sam Adkins of Washington, D.C., and Scott Zarecor of Iowa said they originally had planned a trip to Summit County but were more than happy with their diversion to Steamboat.

“We had three powder days in Jackson Hole last month,” Zarecor said. “Today, we’re pretty stoked.”

Adkins was making his first trip to Steamboat since graduating from The Lowell Whiteman School in 1993.

Steamboat is not alone in enjoying a record-breaking season. On Tuesday, Colorado Ski Country USA reported the season’s 60th powder day, on which at least one resort received five or more inches of snow. Southwest Colorado has been particularly blanketed in powder this winter. While Steamboat sits at the precipice of 400 inches, resorts such as the Wolf Creek Ski Area are flirting with the 500-inch mark.

www.steamboatpilot.com

Take a bite out of closing costs

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

Hold the fees please. How to save if you’re buying a new home or just refinancing.
BEND, Ore. (CNN/Money) – With mortgage rates still as low as they are, financing a house is dirt cheap these days, right?

Not if you pay a fortune in closing costs.

As anyone who has shopped around for a mortgage knows, it’s extremely difficult to compare one lender’s offering to with that of another lender because the up-front fees vary so much and are not guaranteed. Lenders and their venders can, and sometimes do, add or inflate fees in the eleventh hour of a transaction.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has been working on regulations that promise to simplify the mortgage process and save consumers as much as $1,000 off a typical mortgage transaction. When such rules will be rolled out, if ever, is still anyone’s guess.

With no regulation in sight, borrowers should consider these strategies for keeping their closing costs in check.

Get friendly with your current lender
If you’re looking into refinancing, the first call you should make is to your existing lender, who already has critical information about you and your house on file, said Keith Gumbinger, vice president for HSH Associates.Since you have an existing relationship, a “streamlined” process might be possible. That can save you a lot of extra paperwork and money on everything from application fees to appraisal fees.

Although fees for title search and title insurance are not determined by the lender, you may also get a break there. If you recently refinanced or took out a loan, you can save as much as 50 percent on title insurance by asking for a reissue rate, which your lender can request on your behalf.

If you’re a homeowner shopping for a new house, you should also try giving your existing lender first dibs on the new business. Assuming you’ve been a good client and your lender originates the kind of mortgage you’re interested in, it’s possible to get a better-than-market deal, according to Gumbinger.

Get nitpicky about fees…
There are more than a dozen kinds of fees that could show up on your final closing statement, including credit report fees, appraisal fees, document preparation fees, title fees, recording fees and underwriting fees.All told, fees on a $200,000 mortgage could add up to anywhere from $1,000 to $3,000 – that’s not including any “discount” points you pay up front to get the best interest rate. (A “point” is a fee that equals 1 percent of the loan amount.)

Lenders are required to give you a good-faith estimate of your closing costs within three days after you apply for a loan. Some will give you such an estimate even before you apply if you ask for one. Even if it is no guarantee, this written estimate will give you an idea of what kind of fees you can expect to pay, as well as an opportunity to negotiate for a better deal.

“If you’re a good credit borrower you can challenge fees if they seem excessive,” said Gumbinger, noting that lenders don’t control many fees that show up on your statement.

Keep in mind that the good faith estimate doesn’t include such out-of-pocket costs as state mortgage taxes, homeowners insurance and property taxes, which you may be expected to pay at the time of closing. In fact, your total tab at closing could be several times more than originally estimated, said Gumbinger.

… but keep the big picture in view
Closing costs are certainly a consideration for both new loans and refinancing. But it’s important to not lose sight of what should be your first priority – getting the lowest rate possible.Indeed, the difference between paying, say, 6 percent and 5.5 percent on a new loan adds up to nearly $23,000 in total interest on a $200,000 30-year loan. If you have to pay a few hundred dollars in closing costs to get that rate, you can rest assured that it is a worthy investment.

It may even be worth it to pay a point or so up front in order to lock in the lowest rates. Let’s say that you’ll knock your rate down to 5 percent on that $200,000 loan by paying an extra point ($2,000) up front. Considering that you’ll cut $62 off your monthly payment and about $22,000 from total interest by going from 6 percent to 5.5 percent, it makes sense as long as you plan to stay in the house long enough to recoup those up front costs.

In fact, if you’re short on cash you might even consider rolling the closing costs into your loan, if that is an option. You’ll want to consider how much more you’ll pay each month as well as in interest over the life of a loan.

If you roll $2,000 in finance costs into a loan with a 5.5 percent rate, for example, you’ll pay an extra $11 a month and about $2,000 extra in total interest. In this case you’re still better off than if you had not refinanced at all.  Top of page

April 22, 2004: 4:30 PM EDT
By Sarah Max, CNN/Money senior writer

700 team floats metro district

Friday, February 22nd, 2008

Steamboat Springs – The Steamboat 700 development team Thursday suggested implementing a metropolitan district in the site that could be annexed into Steamboat Springs, but received little support from city planners.

Land use attorney Bob Weiss told the Steamboat Springs Plan­ning Commission that such a district would allow the Steamboat 700 community to conduct its own reviews of some architectural standards in some new development. Steamboat 700 could one day include 2,000 homes and more than 275,000 square feet of commercial space between Steamboat Springs Airport and Silver Spur. Weiss’ comments came during a continuation of the project’s pre-application review in Centennial Hall.

“We don’t want to be here in front of you having to debate about roof pitches, landscaping, windows, those kinds of things,” Weiss told the commission. “We would like to try and do that ourselves.”

Weiss said a Steamboat 700 metro district committee could work within architectural guidelines set by the city and “take the burden off city staff.”

But planning commissioners said that is a burden they would like to keep.

“I’m not comfortable having Planning Commission give up its responsibilities for reviewing development within the city,” Commissioner Rich Levy said. “And I’ve heard no compelling reason why we should.”

The Planning Commission instead supported examining how city zoning could be used to streamline reviews of Steamboat 700 development projects and guide compliance with the West of Steamboat Springs Area Plan.

In July 2006, the Steamboat Springs City Council strongly rejected a metro district proposal from developers of the Wildhorse Meadows project on Mount Werner Road. The focus of that metro district was raising property taxes for future Wildhorse homeowners to pay for infrastructure in the development.

“My answer was absolutely no,” then-City Council President Ken Brenner said. “I think it’s not only a bad policy, it’s also a bad precedent to allow a special district like that to be formed inside the city limits. … I think it would be completely irresponsible of city government to do that.”

No formal action was taken Thursday. Pre-application reviews allow developers and city officials to discuss ideas and assess proposals before the formal application process.

Peter Patten, a land use consultant working for Steamboat 700, said the project’s annexation proposal will use data from a community housing demand analysis, a fiscal impact analysis, an area-wide traffic study, a regional transit study and a water and sewer adequacy analysis.

“These are the big five (studies) that are being enacted right now,” he said.

www.steamboatpilot.com

Buying a Share in a Vacation Home When You Can’t Go It Alone

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

Who doesn’t want to own a first-class, destination-quality vacation home without dealing with homeowner headaches and without paying for months of non-use?My most recent article covered the flavors and details of fractional ownership, a best-of-both-worlds ownership structure that reduces costs, yet allows you to enjoy a bundle of first-class amenities.

Now I’m back from the Millionaire Zone to describe a slightly different form of fractional ownership: Shared ownership.

You were intrigued with the range of fractional ownership styles I described, from timeshare-style condo developments to Private Residence Clubs to the posh jet-set Destination Clubs.

But those developments are just that — developments. Massive resort communities of residences, usually set around a golf course and other resort-like amenities.

Just a house, ma’am

You just want a vacation home. A house. A unique structure, constructed like a house, set like a house, decorated like a house. Space and location are important. By the lake, by the beach, in that secluded wooded setting you’ve always coveted.

But say that coveted vacation home is in the North Shore area of California’s Lake Tahoe. On average, it would have set you back $885,335 in 2006. Yikes.

And that’s “on average.” A house in a particularly desirable location would have cost substantially more.

Share with friends, family?

You can see where this is going: Suppose you were to share the ownership of that home with someone else, perhaps with two or three other families. That would drive the cost down, and you’d still have a home to enjoy for three months out of the year or more.

You begin to think: Can I enter such a partnership with someone in my circle of friends and family? We’d share the cost, and it might be fun to have a few weeks or weekends together so the kids can run wild.

But you think about it some more, and some potential issues come up. Everyone has to agree on everything: What to buy, when to buy, how to decorate, how to manage, and when to sell. Finding “friends and family” with the same tastes and checkbook might be a daunting task. And such arrangements can easily lead to these folks becoming friends no longer.

Find a common tenant

A handful of smart realtors in the U.S. have embraced this need and now specialize in selling shared ownership arrangements.

They buy unique, individual homes, and sometimes high-end condos, then sell shares in those properties, usually to two to four buyers. Some shared arrangements carry shares as small as one-eighth.

Technically, the “share” is a tenants-in-common ownership. Investors and corporations have long used the TIC form of ownership to buy everything from commercial properties to executive jets. In the case of shared vacation-home ownership, each TIC arrangement is set up as a custom contract by the real estate agency.

The TIC arrangement allows tenants access to the entire property (not just their “share,” e.g. two rooms upstairs) and allows ownership transfer on death to designated heirs (as opposed to joint tenancy, which calls for transfer to other owners).

Jeff Cutler, a practicing real estate attorney, founded and manages one of the leading agencies, Dreamslice International, headquartered in the Lake Tahoe area.

Having an attorney at the helm makes sense, because each TIC contract is arranged according to the needs of the common owners. An administrative fee is added for a customized menu of services, including everything from basic maintenance and property management to scheduling to what Cutler calls “full concierge” service, where your skis are waxed and tuned and waiting for you when you arrive.

The fees might run $100 to $150 per share per month, but can run higher depending on the service level and number of owners. The greater the number of shares, the higher the fees, because more cleaning and scheduling work is typically required.

Can you rent out your share or use it as an investment property? It depends on how the contract is set up. According to Cutler, most higher-end properties are not set up for rental; the owners simply don’t need the income.

The combination of large fractional share and clear TIC ownership is typically enough to draw favorable real-estate financing, although the lending market still hasn’t fully embraced fractional ownership. Specialists in the field, including Cutler, say that will change.

Advantages of shared ownership

It isn’t hard to see the advantages.

  • Affordability. As an example, a one-fourth share in a four-bedroom Tahoe view home goes for $299,000, obviously far less than you’d pay outright. 
  • Shared costs. Taxes, maintenance, insurance, snow removal, financing costs. The agency manages these things so you don’t have to.
     
  • Deeded ownership. As with all fractionals, you own something that can be bought, sold, borrowed against, or transferred to your heirs.
     
  • Business relationship. No arguing with your in-laws about whether your mounted deer trophy can go over the fireplace, or whether they paid their share of the snow-removal costs.
     
  • Flexibility. You can sell whenever you want, or you can buy out your common tenants as time goes by. Shared ownership can be a great way to get your foot in the door.
     
  • Expanded possibilities. If you’ve got more to spend, consider owning more than one share in different homes in different places. You can get more than one vacation home experience for less than the price of one.

Naturally, there are downsides. Like other fractional developments, you can’t decorate as you please. You can store some stuff, but not as much as if you owned outright. Shared ownership doesn’t usually offer the country-club style amenities you might get with some fractional arrangements. And everything you do to the place — or in it — is governed by some kind of agreement.

Also, the idea hasn’t yet matured enough to provide much choice in home selection or in agencies managing the deals. Dreamslice is a leader in the field, but has only been around for a year-and-a-half. For broader U.S. coverage, Halfshare.com is also worth a look.

I see shared ownership serving the needs of many busy professionals and retirees. The idea will catch on, and soon it’ll be easier to grab your slice.

By Jennifer Openshaw
From MarketWatch

Do-It-Yourself Options for Saving Money on Your Next Move

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

Your home, especially long distance, can cost you a mint if you want full-service packing and shipping. That might be your only option if you have one of the larger McMansions or your apartment is full of antique furnishings that need to be protected. For those who can rough it a little, there are more and more do-it-yourself options out there.

Rental trucks allow you to do it all yourself — pack, drive and unpack.

Say you’re moving from New York City to Danbury, Conn., deep in the suburbs 68 miles away. A 24-foot truck — enough to pack up a three-bedroom apartment — from U-Haul will cost you $271 for two days with 109 miles thrown in.

The same move from New York to Pasadena, Calif., would be $2,746 for 10 days with 3,400 miles included. With Penske, such a cross-country trip in a 26-foot truck costs $2,501 with 10 days and unlimited miles.

If you’re up for packing but not driving, a few services will drop off containers at your home for you to load at your leisure. Then they will drive or ship your furniture to your new home. It costs more than renting but you pay nothing for gas and travel expenses and you get plenty of time to load and unload. The downside: these services aren’t available everywhere and you’ll have to arrange street parking yourself.

Door-To-Door (doortodoor.com) will drop off large crates made of plywood and covered with a weatherproof tarp to your home. They are big enough to hold king-size mattresses and each fits around one bedroom’s worth of furniture. You have five days to load and unload on either end.

Location may be a problem. Door-To-Door serves most, but not all, metro areas. In some places, such as New York City, the company won’t leave the crates on the street overnight. You’ll have to pay for their moving company to load your crates for you.

That will cost you $5,400 for four containers from New York to Los Angeles, for example, or $3,000 from New York to Boston. Prices include insurance up to $1,200 per container.

If you’ve always wanted your own semi, ABF U-Pack Moving will deliver a 28-foot trailer to your street or driveway. You pay by the foot and you can use as much or as little of the trailer as you want. The company packs the rest with commercial freight.

Nineteen feet of trailer space, enough for a three-bedroom home, would cost $3,000 from Chicago to Los Angeles, but you may have to pack it in one day depending on parking regulations. Insurance is not included.

Compare those rates with Allied Van Lines, a full-service international mover. For the same three-bedroom, you’ll pay around $7,000 for a cross-country move or $3,000 for New York to Danbury just for the transport, plus another $2,000 for full-service packing.

By Marshall Loeb
From Marketwatch

Our View: The drive for traffic funding

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

Steamboat Springs – The biggest hurdle to widening and improving U.S. Highway 40 from 13th Street west to Steamboat II isn’t how to do it or whether to do it – it’s how to fund it. For that reason, city of Steamboat Springs and Routt County officials as well as our state legislators should play an active role in lobbying for funds to offset the cost of such a significant capital project.

Widening U.S. 40 west of downtown Steamboat is critical to increasing the capacity of Routt County’s major (and in some cases, only) east-west thoroughfare. That need already is apparent by the steady stream of headlights flowing into Steamboat from the west each weekday morning, and repeating itself in the opposite direction each evening. The expansion to U.S. 40 will become a must when construction on the massive Steamboat 700 development commences, possibly as soon as 2010.

Although the need to widen U.S. 40 east of downtown Steamboat has been discussed for more than a decade, little has been produced as far as specific recommendations. That is changing.

On Thursday, consultants from Stolfus & Associates presented a draft of their West Steamboat Springs U.S. 40 Access Plan. The plan details techniques for improving travel on U.S. 40, including removing some existing access points and eliminating turning vehicles from through-traffic lanes. An accompanying capacity analysis will examine the potential widening of U.S. 40 from two lanes to four lanes from 13th Street west to the Steamboat II subdivision outside of city limits.

The Colorado Department of Transportation, which has the final say on improvements to U.S. 40, is partnering with the city on the studies. CDOT has contributed $50,000 for the plans.

That’s good news, as City Engineer Janet Hruby pointed out, because having such plans in place could help U.S. 40 improvements get prioritization – and funding – from CDOT. But those hopes must be tempered with the reality that transportation funding from the state is anything but guaranteed. Gov. Bill Ritter’s Blue Ribbon Transportation Panel released a report Wednesday that identified transportation funding as a “quiet crisis.”

Steamboat Springs City Council members and Routt County commissioners should take a lead role in lobbying for funding and prioritization of U.S. 40 improvements. The city also could have a wild card in George Krawzoff, the city’s outgoing transportation director who is a recent appointee to the Colorado Transportation Commission.

Our state legislators can be even more influential in pushing U.S. 40 improvements at the state level. We hope to see candidates for state Senate District 8 and state House District 57 make the future project a part of their campaign.

Motor vehicle traffic along U.S. Highway 40 will continue to increase as Craig and Hayden continue to grow and future developments such as Steamboat 700 come online. There’s a limited pot of money to fund transportation projects statewide, and the importance of U.S. 40 improvements to traffic flow into and out of Steamboat Springs demands the efforts of our elected officials.

www.steamboatpilot.com

Access plan sparks interest

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

Steamboat Springs – Local business owners questioned a future traffic plan for U.S. Highway 40 in west Steamboat Springs during a crowded open house Thursday in Centennial Hall. Others who attended the event were happy with the plan, claiming something has to be done to relieve congestion and danger along the highway.

In their second public open house, consultants from Stolfus & Associates presented a draft of their West Steamboat Springs U.S. 40 Access Plan. The plan recommends several techniques for improving travel on U.S. 40, such as eliminating some of the current accesses to the highway and removing turning vehicles from through traffic lanes.

“Our concern is that they show both of our access points are set to be blocked,” said Ulrich Salzgeber, who owns the Routt 66 gas station in west Steamboat with Marty Waldron. “Blocking these two access points is seriously going to decrease the value of our property. … They need to come up with other solutions.”

Salzgeber and Waldron lease the majority of their building to Alpine Taxi. Waldron noted that rerouting a fleet of 100 taxis, shuttles and vans to side streets could be quite costly and difficult. The two men, like other business owners who attended the open house, are not swayed by officials’ claims that access closures will be overcompensated by more efficient traffic flows that will benefit business.

“Ease is everything,” said Steamboat Rentals owner Jack Horner, who believes his direct access to U.S. 40 is crucial to his business. “This is my livelihood. I don’t have a solution to it … but this will cost me most of my drive-in customers from the east.”

Dan Roussin, an access manager with the Colorado Department of Transportation, tried to calm such concerns by stressing the long-term nature of the plan.

“I understand it’s not perfect for everybody,” Roussin said. “What we want to do is plan the whole thing and do the best we can.”

Cost question

Engineering consultant Michelle Hansen said comments made Thursday would be incorporated into a final draft of the plan. She was happy with the large turnout.

“I’m pleased we’re getting a lot more property owners than last time,” she said. “It’s better to get them involved early.”

The access management plan costs $100,000. An accompanying capacity analysis looking at the potential widening of U.S. 40 to four lanes costs $50,000. Both plans deal with the U.S. 40 corridor from 13th Street to just past the Steamboat II subdivision, which is outside city limits. CDOT is partnering with the city in its efforts and has contributed $50,000.

“The ultimate goal is the city, county and CDOT will sign an intergovernmental agreement adopting this plan,” Hansen said.

City Engineer Janet Hruby said no funding has been identified for U.S. 40 improvements, but both studies will aid the city in getting such improvements prioritized – and maybe paid for – by CDOT. Hruby said developers might also be required to take care of their portion of the highway as sites are redeveloped.

“This is a huge tool not only for city staff but for developers,” Hruby said. “It’s a lot easier when you have a plan like this so they know up front.”

Any potential funding from CDOT faces the difficulty of competing with many other projects for the department’s ever-thinning resources. A report released Wednesday by Gov. Bill Ritter’s Blue Ribbon Transportation Panel says Colorado’s transportation funding is in a “quiet crisis” and desperate for a bigger statewide investment.

George Krawzoff, the city’s outgoing transportation director and a recent appointee to the Colorado Transportation Commission, said the problem is compounded by the fact that the construction price index is increasing more than the overall consumer price index.

“Overall, CDOT has a very difficult time funding road expansions,” Krawzoff said. “We’ve put everything in place to make progress on this, but the costs to make any improvements are huge.”

www.steamboatpilot.com

On-mountain upgrades planned

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

Steamboat Springs – When the slopes at the Steamboat Ski Area are devoid of skiers and riders in the upcoming off-season, construction crews will take their place.

Before the 2008-09 ski season begins, Steamboat Ski and Resort Corp. officials hope to revamp the resort’s on-mountain food and beverage facilities, upgrade the Elkhead chairlift and create new parking solutions, pending approval from Intrawest, ULC, executives next month.

“There continue to be a lot of exciting things headed for Steamboat,” said Intrawest’s Chief Marketing Officer, Andy Wirth, at Ski Corp.’s ninth annual Airline Partners Summit on Wednesday at the Steamboat Grand Resort Hotel.

As a fixed-grip chairlift, Elk­head is limited in its speed due to the difficulty of loading four passengers on a fast-moving lift, Wirth said. With upgrades, passengers next season can have a smoother, faster ride, he said.

Given the success of recent revisions to food and beverage facilities at Rendezvous Saddle and Thunderhead, the ski area is looking at enhancements to existing facilities and discussing the possible addition of entirely new facilities.

“Everything’s on the table,” Wirth said.

On-mountain improvements are one of four prongs in the ski area’s long-term development plan, known as Steamboat Unbridled. The strategy also includes base area redevelopment, real estate development and airport and air access.

“In the past 15 years, this resort has been greatly underutilized and struggled to compete in a very competitive market,” Wirth said.

Projects incorporated under Steamboat Unbridled aim to change that through new development and infrastructure improvements, designed in ways that maintain Steamboat’s hospitality and Western charm, Wirth said.

Some base area projects already have gotten under way, including improvements to Gondola Transit Center. Other projects, including roundabouts on Mount Werner Circle, the proposed daylighting of Burgess Creek and a pedestrian promenade at the base of the Headwall area are in the planning stages.

Steamboat Springs currently has lodging for up to 18,700 people, although that figure will drop slightly in the coming years as older properties, such as the Thunderhead Lodge and Condominiums, are demolished to make way for new development, Wirth said.

Just more than half of Steam­boat’s lodging capacity is located in the base area, and Intrawest’s real estate focus in the coming years will be on boosting that number, particularly at “high-quality” properties, he said.

While the ski area does not anticipate a need for more airline seats during season until 2010, when additional lodging capacity is developed, efforts already are under way to modernize air traffic control into Yampa Valley Regional Airport.

Because of Colorado’s mountainous terrain, radar capabilities are lost below about 10,000 feet, said Bill Payne, program director for air traffic control modernization at the Colorado Department of Transportation.

A sophisticated new system undergoing installation for the airports in Hayden, Steamboat Springs and Craig will help to eliminate missed approaches and limit diversions, Payne said. The new tracking system is expected to complete testing and become fully operational in time for ski season service in 2009, he said.

The new system will improve airline and passenger experiences, cut down the required intervals between landings from 15 to only two minutes and hopefully limit the need of aircraft to circle while awaiting arrival, Wirth said.

“The whole experience of getting there and getting home is paramount,” Intrawest CEO Alex Wasilov said Wednesday. “We don’t just sell lift tickets.”

http://www.steamboatpilot.com/

Butterfly Barn may stay put

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

Steamboat Springs – Having failed in attempts to relocate the historic Butterfly Barn on Mount Werner Road, the city of Steamboat Springs will consider a proposal from the developers of Wildhorse Meadows that would let the barn stay put.

At tonight’s Steamboat Springs City Council meeting, developers will present their preferred plan for the barn, which is to leave it in place and surround it with interpretive trails and signage.

An alternative proposal is to deconstruct the barn and use any salvageable material in the construction of the Wildhorse Meadows plaza. The city planning staff and the Historic Preservation Advisory Commission support the first option.

In 2006, the Steamboat Springs City Council ex­­pressed concerns that the Wildhorse Meadows development would dwarf the barn and asked that efforts be made to move it. The city’s advisory committee for redevelopment at the base of the Steamboat Ski Area originally had hoped to relocate the barn to the grassy knoll at Mount Werner Road and Mount Werner Circle, but failed in negotiations with the Steamboat Grand Resort Hotel’s homeowners association, which owns the land.

“We couldn’t find a good spot for it that would work for everybody,” said Joe Kracum, the city’s redevelopment coordinator for the base area.

The city also considered moving the barn between Central Park Plaza and Mount Werner Road by the Village Inn and at the intersection of Mount Werner and Pine Grove roads.

“They weren’t perfect sites for visibility or for making it an icon at the entrance to the base area,” Kracum said.

Pam Duckworth, chairwoman of the Historic Preservation Advisory Com­mission, said the commission strongly supports leaving the barn in place.

“Moving historic buildings makes them ineligible for listings on (historic) registers,” Duckworth said. “It’s frowned upon and pretty much done as a last resort.”

While the barn’s rural context is quickly evaporating around it, Duckworth said the proposal to incorporate the barn is much preferred to a deconstruction.

“It’s happening all over the state and the country that development is infringing on historic areas and historic structures,” she said. “Hopefully there’s enough room that there can be a buffer and it can stand out.”

Also today, the City Council will consider the first reading of an ordinance that would reconfigure the city’s Local Liquor License Authority into two divisions: administrative and compliance.

The proposal would require the city to contract with a hearing officer to review all liquor violations and failed compliance check violations.

www.steamboatpilot.com

Shelton sizes up Steamboat

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

Steamboat Springs – Since starting his new job earlier this month, Steamboat Springs Public Works Director Philo Shelton has been getting a crash course on the city.

“There’s plenty to learn,” said Shelton, who held the same position in Black Hawk before City Manager Alan Lanning lured him to Steamboat. “Every town has different aspects you have to learn. … It’s a good variety of work. There’s usually never the same issues or problems.”

Besides vowing to improve the department’s customer service, Shelton is conducting an inventory of the city’s infrastructure, reviewing proposed projects and meeting consultants before formulating any concrete plans. In February, he will hold a workshop with the Steamboat Springs City Council to discuss projects.

The current building boom in Steamboat puts pressure on a public works system, but Shelton said he is comfortable with the workload.

“As far as commercial development,” Shelton said, “Black Hawk’s development is very similar.”

A primarily residential dev­elop­­ment, however, likely will present some of Shelton’s most significant challenges. The proposed Steamboat 700 development west of the city could create more than 2,000 new homes and expand city limits.

“The whole city’s going to go through a major process with Steamboat 700 development,” said Transportation Director George Krawzoff, who noted that the West of Steamboat Springs Area Plan calls for high levels of public transit. “Figuring out how to achieve that, I think, is going to be a huge issue.”

Transportation will soon be within Shelton’s domain. Krawzoff has announced he will resign as transportation director in March to accept an appointment to the Colorado Transportation Commission.

With Krawzoff’s departure, Lanning plans to move the Transportation Department under the Public Works Depart­ment and Shelton. Lanning said two areas of expertise that stand out for Shelton are transit and water rights.

“One of the things we’ve got to review with the Steamboat 700 development is going to be the demand on the water system,” Shelton said.

Shelton said the construc­­tion of the New Victory Highway might create some opportunities to benefit the water system for all of west Steamboat because it will create an opportunity for more water line loops and create redundancy, or the ability to deliver water from more than one pipe system.

The lack of redundancy on the west side of the city created an emergency situation in September, when a construction contractor broke a water line near the Bud Werner Memorial Library. The break led to a two-day-long ban on using city water for any purpose in west Steamboat. Deputy City Manager Wendy DuBord said Thursday that the experience encouraged the city to revisit its utilities plan.

Shelton moved to Steamboat with his wife Debbie, his 8-year-old daughter Sydney and his 6-year-old son, also named Philo. He said many factors drew him here.

“I like living in the mountains,” Shelton said. “One of the things that’s appealing is there’s a community; it’s not just a resort town. … I enjoy skiing, too, so that’s a plus.”

www.steamboatpilot.com